Subject:
|
Re: New loc group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:23:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
284 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ben Roller writes:
> On a more serious note, what are the "requirements", if any, for getting
> your city a subgroup of its own in the appropriate .loc.state group?
Sorta ad-hoc... If there are at least 2 people in a reasonably large metro
area (or even a small isolated one) who could make use of a specialized group
for their area, then most likely the group probably ought to be created,
especially if there is no equally viable alternative existing already.
What do you have in mind in particular?
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New loc group
|
| Todd: (...) Oh, and the state of Kentucky used to be Kentucky County, Virginia until KY became a state in 1792, so could you put .loc.us.ky as one of those virtual links under .loc.us.va? ;) On a more serious note, what are the "requirements", if (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
