Subject:
|
Re: Maybe "Dear Lego" sub groups would help
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 20:35:20 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
<snippage>
> At this point, I could see one or the other of the following working fairly
> well:
>
> 1) <snip>
> 2) Subgroups of a new hierarchy lugnet.lego:
>
> lugnet.lego.announce
> lugnet.lego.clubs
> lugnet.lego.direct
> lugnet.lego.direct.bulk
> lugnet.lego.events
> lugnet.lego.legal
> lugnet.lego.www
>
> And additionally, either breaking lugnet.dear-lego into
>
> lugnet.dear-lego.rant
> lugnet.dear-lego.rave
>
> or just keeping lugnet.dear-lego as it is (was) and not creating new
> .rant & .rave subgroups.
>
>
> Of those two options (and there may still be others), #2 makes more sense
> to me, from the following viewpoints:
<more snippage>
I like #2 better as well. One option I didn't see in your post, and that I
think would be a Good Thing is a FAQ group (lugnet.lego.faq?). A good way to
manage it would be to only allow Brad (or other LEGO Direct employees,
assuming we eventually see more than him here) posting priviledges to it, and
allow them to determine what qualifies.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
