 | | Re: Enough already —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I certainly hope I'm not being included in this category. Your remarks in the quoted message deal mostly with scanned images, which was not my concern. I feel the issue of linking is an extremely serious one, and I would really resent being (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Enough already —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) No. --Todd (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Enough already —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Ok; thanks for re-clarifying. *grin* (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Enough already —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I think it's excellent to seek clarification on issues like that, when the wording implies a possible confusion or ambiguity about the legal ramifications. (...) No, I wasn't trying to attack anyone with legitimate concerns. I wasn't trying to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Enough already —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Ditto. If not "keeping quiet" is what takes me out of the "respectful majority" and makes me a sour grape on issues that actually ARE important, as opposed to showing just how much of a bunch of suck-ups we can all be, then sour be I. Is this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Enough already —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | (...) Elucidate. By e-mail, if you prefer. (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Enough already —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Nothing I wouldn't say in public. I think calling the scans Huw hosted (which I thought was a very MINOR deal) "preview scans" was a little much. Nothing major. If I were using a different reader I might be able to call your post up and (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
