 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs —Ben Gatrelle
|
| | | (...) What about <www.LEGO.com/topsecret> which when I found it last year had pre- release pics of the original SW sets that were coming out. There was a refernce to this URL in a Mania Magazine (which published the URL) but there was no link to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) There were, however, images on the SW portion of lego.com which were being served from that webserver (IIRC, not www.lego.com, though). A simple view source revealed thew existece of that webserver. (...) Yeah. I wonder when I'm gonna get an (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Ben Gatrelle wrote in message ... (...) page (...) pre- (...) there (...) That URL has been published and is clearly intended for public consumption. Frank Filz Posting from my Dad's (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) How do you know that any given URL isn't published in some magazine somewhere? Furthermore, the Lego statement doesn't make an exception for this. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Thanks, Lego! (was Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | Brad Justus has posted a clarification of his earlier statement: <URL:(URL) I'm officially satisfied with this -- and pleasantly surprised by the quick response. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thanks, Lego! (was Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) And excellent point. :) Me too. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
