 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Does Netiquette = illegal or does Netiquette = polite? That's a question, not a challenge. Is the same information without being a clickable hyperlink okay? Mind you, I'm willing to go along with Lego's request based on politeness, regardless. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) If Lego changes their statement to be: "Out of politeness, please don't publish URLs not clickable through links on our pages", I would also be inclined to respect that. The "don't do this because it violates our legal rights" stuff is what (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) I would almost certainly respect that. Unfortunately, that's not what is being said.. (...) Indeed. Jasper (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) With regard to the issues at hand, I would prefer it if everyone respected Brad's and therefore TLC's wishes, regardless of legality. In other words, out of courtesy and respect for the company whose products we love and are here to have fun (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) and (...) Now here, we're talking about a different issue. I read the above as that you copied the images. If so, deleting them, and not sharing them is NOT just "being a nice guy", it is obeying the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
