 | | Re: i admit i was wrong —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) I take it back. I just had a short talk with my father about voting ratios, and there's something important I was overlooking... 2/3 (66.67%) is a good number after all. 5/7 (71.4%) isn't bad either, but 2/3 is much simpler to express, and it (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: i admit i was wrong —Tom McDonald
| | | | | (...) Yes it does though, IMO, I think a slightly greater majority (just under 5% more) is worth considering (and you probly already have so this section is more or less a waste of bandwidth on my part). 2/3 is much simpler to express, but I hafta (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: i admit i was wrong —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) It doesn't really have anything to do with which body, it just has to do with the ordering. It's a two-step thing. A 1/2 majority is required in order to do a CFV (call for votes), then a 2/3 majority is required to pass the measure. As I (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
