 | | Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy —Tom McDonald
| | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) From the outset, I like this better. It's more intuitive. Dropping SYSTEM, because we can't really identify a pattern as to what qualifies as SYSTEM, is a good idea as well as dropping (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Right -- Space used to be called LEGOLAND Space, but now it's called LEGO SYSTEM Space or the LEGO Space System. (I'd have to check with Joshua to be absolutely sure, but that's basically the idea.) It would take a temporal database to put (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy —Steve Demlow
| | | | | (...) I don't see much point in trying to stick to TLG's hierarchy. Not only would it involve kludges to resolve past inconsistencies/changes, you would be faced with the prospect of having to _move_ an existing category next time TLG decides to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
