 | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) I assumed Todd *did* mean 'MUHK' to rhyme with 'muck'. I didn't think about it at the time, but 'UH' doesn't look much like it should be pronounced like the sounds in either "book" or "fluke". Steve (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Phonetics for "LUGNET" trademark and member IDs (was Re: member id's: simple numbers or something mo —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | | (...) That's essentially the problem with colloquial phonetic spelling -- there are two methods. Some people (like me) use existing words whenever existing words are available: Todd: "TODD", Lugnet: "LUG-net", Steve: "STEVE", phonetic: (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | O vs WO vs AH —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, how close is that to TWOD? (I gather that's the native-East-Coast way to pronounce it -- similar to BWOS'-tin. :) Where I grew up (Minneapolis) it's pronounced TAHD, but not quite the nasal TAAHHHD that they say in Milwaukee and Chicago. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: O vs WO vs AH —John Bauman
|
| | | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <37a0e8e2.108331275@...et.com>... (...) Is the east coast you refer to the upper part of maine? I never heard it pronounced like that. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: O vs WO vs AH —Ed Jones
|
| | | | (...) Ah, a great mystery of life has become revealed. Now I understand Todd's attraction to LEGO. Being from Mininoplace, he naturally took to minifigs. :') (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
