 | | Re: Proposed message (was: Re: New blood) —Mike Stanley
| | | | (...) You have some typos in this one, among other things. I applaud your desire to do this, but so you don't reinvent the wheel, take a look back for this same kind of message that Larry (and others?) crafted several months ago. I'm sure Todd could (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Proposed message (was: Re: New blood) —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Heh heh heh, OK, I have to ask -- is your comment meant to be facetious, or does that weird URL thing really seem like magic? Doing that weird URL thing is really pretty easy, and I hope that more people will learn to use it, because it's a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Proposed message (was: Re: New blood) —Mike Stanley
| | | | | (...) Man, I must be facetious pretty often with people always wondering if that's what I'm shooting for. Given that you guys have never had the pleasure of hearing my tone of voice or seeing my facial expressions that's pretty funny in an eerily (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
