 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Patricia Schempp
|
| | | I think for continuity's sake, the numbers should all have the same number of digits. Having some with on, some with two or three would be confusing. But I guess you could always do the 005, 083 thing. Hmm...who gets 007? (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Sanjay D'Souza
|
| | | | | Who gets 007?...easy....the person who can do the best imitation of Bond Here's my attempt.... "The name's Bond.....James Bond..." How's that?....I challenge anyone to beat that. Sanjay Patricia Schempp wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | Now, here's mine.... "You know you're the only woman in my life, Moneypenny..." Do I win? Mine had more words in it. -Tom McD. when replying, note that Q never made plastic explosive that looked like spamcake. (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That would be nice, but the only way to guarantee that all the numbers have the same number of digits is either to start at a really, really high number and ignore all lower numbers, or pre-fix the number of digits at something large -- (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
