Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:56:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
454 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Patricia Schempp writes:
> I think for continuity's sake, the numbers should all have the same
> number of digits. Having some with on, some with two or three would
> be confusing. But I guess you could always do the 005, 083 thing.
> Hmm...who gets 007?
That would be nice, but the only way to guarantee that all the numbers
have the same number of digits is either to start at a really, really
high number and ignore all lower numbers, or pre-fix the number of digits
at something large -- definitely more than 3.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| I think for continuity's sake, the numbers should all have the same number of digits. Having some with on, some with two or three would be confusing. But I guess you could always do the 005, 083 thing. Hmm...who gets 007? (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
