General Discussions about LUGNET : 1910


Administrative / General / 1910	1909 \| 1911

Subject:	Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:55:28 GMT
Viewed:	128 times

In lugnet.cad, Jeff Stembel writes: > This newsgroup [lugnet.cad] is essentially obsolete. Is it? Hmm. Let me see. Under CAD, we've got groups for: - posting DAT/MPD files - developers & developing (parts and software) Seems like there are a lot of other possible topics for LEGO CAD not covered by these two areas. What about people asking for models, or help with software, or suggestions, or presentation techniques, etc? Seems like there's still a little life left in lugnet.cad. Steve

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...)
(...) Oops.. I forgot that cad.dat auto-redirected to cad. What I meant is cad.dat is obsolete. Sorry for any confusion! :) Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)

		Re: Is lugnet.cad Obsolete? (was: 6 wide auto carrier ...)
(...) Heh heh, oops! Actually, Jeff was referring to lugnet.cad.dat, Steve. :) Jeff wrote: (...) And he was talking about Thomas Burger's post to lugnet.cad.dat... Here's the thread: (URL) gotta figure out how to stop lugnet.cad.dat from receiving (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: 6 wide auto carrier trailer (autotrlr.dat) 1 of 2
(...) Nice Trailer! But this message should've been posted to cad.dat.models. This newsgroup is essentially obsolete. Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search