Subject:
|
Re: Test of Real Life tag
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:41:43 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguy.SPAMLESScom
|
Viewed:
|
488 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> This is not anonymity from the authorities. People know that if there
> was an issue they could contact you and in turn the person. It's just
> anonymity from the general public.
Hrmmm, making no assumptions about what this hypothetical person may
or may not discuss, but what happens if said person starts discussing
things that only someone from the inside of TLG would know? Further,
what happens if TLG sees this and comes to Todd, asking, in whatever
way, that he reveal said person's identity?
If said person revealed something TLG considered priveledged info,
could Todd be culpable in any way for making a specific opportunity
for that person to do so with an implied bit of safety along with the
annonymity?
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 ext 222 (S@H Canada)
www.auczilla.com - World's Largest Online Selection of LEGO Pieces
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Test of Real Life tag
|
| (...) I saw that discussion after I started hacking around. Good approach. Now, as to the anonymity aspect of things, I have been thinking about this a bit. Don't take this as anything more than a thought starter. What if there were a person who was (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
