To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1548
1547  |  1549
Subject: 
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 4 May 1999 16:05:53 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.!nospam!com
Viewed: 
673 times
  
Ed Jones wrote:

I think "abusive, ... defamatory,  ... profane, or indecent" covers it very
well without bringing direct attention to "Racist" or "Sexist".  I fully
understand the intent, but I would be astonished to find discriminatory
postings around here.  Even on RTL, that lucious newsgroup of auctions, spam
and flame wars, I was never abused because of my sexual orientation.  Far from
it.

We have plenty of other reasons to abuse you, no need to worry on that
score. :-)

Seriously, I think more general statements are better. In line with my
Libertarian philosophy, I tend not to favor specific prohibitions of
things that common law already addresses, and I think the same principle
applies here.

Specific prohibitions allow loopholes and sea lawyering. Todd should
make the intent clear that civi discussion, free of defamation and
inflammatory rhetoric is desired, and that membership here (although not
censoring of individual appends) rides on adherence to civility, at the
sole discretion of the proprietor. Invite offline questions, or even
discussion of appropriate behaviour in this venue. if you like.

I believe that is already the case and no changes are needed.

--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) from (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) I think "abusive, ... defamatory, ... profane, or indecent" covers it very well without bringing direct attention to "Racist" or "Sexist". I fully understand the intent, but I would be astonished to find (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR