To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1541
1540  |  1542
Subject: 
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 3 May 1999 20:37:22 GMT
Viewed: 
798 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
Richard Franks <richard@__no_spam_please_im_veggie__spider.com> wrote:
that you do not:
5.  Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous,
       defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent
       information of any kind, including without limitation any
       transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would
       constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or
       otherwise violate any local, state, national, or international
       law.

There isn't a mention of any racist or sexist (eg homophobic)
limitations. Like everything else, the chances of any of this arising
remain small, but does anyone else think they deserve a specific
mention?

[snip]
I think they'd fall under abusive.  But mentioning them explicitly might be
a good idea.

[snip]
--Todd

I think "abusive, ... defamatory,  ... profane, or indecent" covers it very
well without bringing direct attention to "Racist" or "Sexist".  I fully
understand the intent, but I would be astonished to find discriminatory
postings around here.  Even on RTL, that lucious newsgroup of auctions, spam
and flame wars, I was never abused because of my sexual orientation.  Far from
it.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) We have plenty of other reasons to abuse you, no need to worry on that score. :-) Seriously, I think more general statements are better. In line with my Libertarian philosophy, I tend not to favor specific prohibitions of things that common (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) I think they'd fall under abusive. But mentioning them explicitly might be a good idea. Richard, have you seen/read/discovered something disturbing? --Todd (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR