 | | Re: Death to all Auzzies - or who killed HTTP lugnet?
|
|
(...) Hi Chris, I am afraid I cannot exactly follow your point. It may very well be that you experienced a small (or medium) lag between the time of your post and the actual appearance of the post on LUGNET's website - this is due to the indexing (...) (17 years ago, 20-May-08, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Please support my optimization effort on advertisements
|
|
Hi all, I am currently trying to optimize the appearance of advertisements on LUGNET. This is both in order to achieve a clean appearance of the web pages (so that the ads don't get on anyone's nerves too much) and of course to ensure we keep LUGNET (...) (17 years ago, 20-May-08, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | 24 hr missing http was Re: who killed HTTP lugnet?
|
|
(...) Sorry for not being more clear. I thought there was a lugnet wide problem, and my post was just a note to bring it to attention, and to be silly (...) Jerry. When both Janey, and I experienced the same problem, I just presumed it was system (...) (17 years ago, 20-May-08, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 24 hr missing http was Re: who killed HTTP lugnet?
|
|
(...) Chris, no confusion as such, no - let's rather call it a slight disturbance ;) No, really, I have cross-checked again, and the only thing I seem to find is that we do have a time zone discrepancy between the NNTP and HTTP news post display. (...) (17 years ago, 21-May-08, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 24 hr missing http was Re: who killed HTTP lugnet?
|
|
Okay, it appears that due to the amount of still-incoming spam we do have a lag with regard to handling authentication emails. That's not exactly new, and it's not exactly as bad as it used to be - my last test took about 15 minutes to show up after (...) (17 years ago, 21-May-08, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
