|
|
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, you'd be qrong--the available evidence is that he, you know, is better than this. However, being sniped at by, well, many, many people, is grating and I can't blame someone for lashing out. That said, I fully realize that his lashing (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Shouldn't this be correctly posted in lugnet.admin.terms? Tim PS. Fup-to set to .off-topic.PUN ===== (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You have used this term incorrectly. Properly used, it is: D'OH! ====== Thank you. JOHN (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, the available evidence indicates that he's, you know, not. So I think it's probably better to appeal to the people poking him. And since I used to be one of them, who better to deliver the message? Guys, he's only worth so much of (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| Re: (murfl) My apologies to LUGNet and to those I've inconvenienced- I just got caught up in the event. I don't hold any personal grudge against Eric, I just sometimes wish he would walk away and not respond. Like I should have done. Again, I (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
