 | | Re: Are you missing news-by-mail digests/forwards? —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | "Gereon "Jerry" Stein" <jerry@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:J1B9D9.nvx@lugnet.com... (...) The problem is that I post via the web and don't want to receive ANY posts via email, I prefer the newsreader client to do that. (...) I strongly (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Are you missing news-by-mail digests/forwards? — Gereon Stein
|
| | | | (...) Okay, it appears I misunderstood you to that extent. Sorry about that. Then again, the issue is still, that mailing lists as a standard use the original From: address (which is you) but change the Reply-To field to the mailing list itself. I (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are you missing news-by-mail digests/forwards? —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | "Gereon "Jerry" Stein" <jerry@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:J1Bv8v.I56@lugnet.com... (...) Actually since you're handling the mailing lists, why not consider changing things so that they better suit the current situation. What I mean is this: (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are you missing news-by-mail digests/forwards? — Gereon Stein
|
| | | | (...) In theory, that would be a way of handling things. In practice, this would overthrow the way mailing lists (not only LUGNET but in general) have handled header setting and reply behavior. I would not want to copy a well-known software firm in (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are you missing news-by-mail digests/forwards? —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | "Gereon "Jerry" Stein" <jerry@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:J1DsE0.G5t@lugnet.com... (...) Unfortunately, you're causing IBs to become blacklisted for something you ultimately have responsibility for. One of your options would include going to (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
