|
|
 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Yes I should. I've just woken up (in the morning sense, not the metaphorical sense) enough to realise that my continued posting in this subthread is every bit as bad as your starting of it. Unless I see something I really disagree with I will (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Jeff Stembel summed up my motives for response very well (better than I have so far) in his (URL) response> to Mark so I won't bother trying to explain them again. (...) I'm a bit suspicious as to why we are getting so many admins from BZPower (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) I don't see Mark pursuing 'an agenda' here at all, I see him following up on a perfectly reasonable question that wasn't answered initially. Here are his exact words: "What was done to the people who baited and flamed?" He goes on to say he (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) You know, I had a big reply I was about to post, but that I thought of what (URL) Suz said:> "Know when to drop it. Some people have a difficult time quitting arguments. Either they're afraid of losing face, they insist on having the last (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
