To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13294
    Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Todd Lehman
   (...) Hrm... ok, whoops, missed otd. Restoring now, should be back soon. Let us know if any other missing areas are discovered. --Todd (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
   
        Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Timothy Gould
     --SNIP-- (...) .trains is still missing Thanks for all the painfully tedious work it must be restoring this. Tim (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
   
        Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
     (...) Wow! Did you have to re-type all of those messages by hand? You're amazing! However, I notice that you made a bunch of typos in reposting my messages... Thanks for restoring all of this. What a pain in the roast that must have been for you. (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
     (...) Why? Did the retyped ones make sense? >;-D JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —David Koudys
      (...) Ba-dum Dum!! Thank you folks!! John'll be playing here all week! Dave K (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
     
          Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
      (...) Hey, you sounded pretty good delivering that line, Dave! (not that I'm confusing you with Dave!) Let's hear you say, (URL) Johnny!"> :-D JOHN (most scared I've ever been at a movie) All work and no play makes John a dull boy. All work and no (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
     
          Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —David Koudys
      In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> No TV and no beer make Homer something, something... Most scared I've been during a Simpsons Episode... :) Dave K (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
     (...) Of course not--you can't make something from nothing. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
     (...) Oh, your pseudo-self deprecation is soooo transparent, Dave! JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
     (...) It's true--I only deprecate my pseudo-self. My real self remains totally undeprecated. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
     (...) Hmmm, I'm of 2 minds regarding the depiction of your undeprecated debunking. JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
     (...) Honesty compels me to admit that I misread that, so that it looked as if you were questioning my underappreciated spelunking. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —John Neal
     (...) Book'em, Guano! Actually, I'm in the dark on that topic. JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Dave Schuler
     (...) Sounds to me like you're totally batsh-- I mean, totally crazy. Dave! FUT: lugnet.off-topic.pus...ng-the-TOS (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
   
        Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Duane Hess
     (...) .Space is missing too. -Duane (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
    
         Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Ray Sanders
     (...) .Castle and .General both look pretty sparse Ray (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
   
        Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads? —Frank Filz
   (...) What all groups got damaged? It seems like I have to reset things in Outlook Express in the damaged groups (though maybe if I didn't reset them right after the damage, now that the restore has happened they're ok). Thanks Frank (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR