| |
I'm sorry but it did not show up like that in email for me. I checked the
message on the web and it was in your post that showed up with the line being
long, not mine.
Ryan
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/8/99, at 3:28 PM, Paul Foster wrote:
> SCOTT R DENNETT wrote:
> >
> > I have to agree here. Some of your messages are kind of(sometimes very)
> > confusing. And when you reply to a message you delete what was in the message
> > rather than leaving the part of the original message you were replying to. If
> > you were to do that, then that would help A LOT. Also like Sproat said
> > punctuation and caps would also help, and even punctuation would make the
> > messages easier to read. For example you could write what you did like this
> > so that it would sound ok when reading it.
> >
> > "since i posted the announcement, i have added 'not disk' and 'cylinder
> > support'." or
> > "Since I posted the announcement, I have added 'not disk' and 'cylinder
> > support'." rather than
> > "since i posted the announcement i have added not disk and cylinder support"
>
> Could you set your line length to less than 80? The whole sentence
> above that
> starts with "I have to" is one huge long line.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
