|
|
 | | Re: P&P document
|
| Yep. Read it. Please see my reply here : (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| You mentioned the efficiency of a tiered review process as a reason for not making everything about lugnet administration public. I don't buy that. I submit that efficency is irrelavent to the problem at hand and I beleive that recent events clearly (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) LUGNET historians might remember the flurry of posts about CP and cp--community policing. It was all in the open and we all chimed in and we all hashed it out (at least those of us who felt strongly about it) (...) Again, perception, even if (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | LUGNET members association
|
| I move to form a new organization (not led by myself), that consists of members (if you aren't a member of LUGNET, what's the holdup?) of the LUGNET community. The association would govern the majority of the members needs, desires, problems, (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
| | | | | Re: P&P document
|
| (...) Unfortunately, it's an option, albeit one that I don't think anyone likes. There have been many posts recently about lack of trust in the administration of LUGNET, with some justification. But it works both ways. Admins need to be able to (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
