Subject:
|
Re: P&P document
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:46:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
602 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> Many have asked to see this, so here it is:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/~2626/pp/
Kevin,
I can understand your desire for full disclosure. However, I feel these
documents aren't ready to be released publicly at this time, and I have edited
the document links at the above address. Rather than have unfinished
documentation floating around, the admin staff prefers to finalize the documents
and have them reviewed by a small group of interested members before general
release. It would be counterproductive and difficult to effectively implement
meaningful input if hundreds of people were responding to an incomplete project.
I'd thought that it was understood this review process was a confidential
exercise; it's apparent we need to be more explicit about confidentiality in the
future, possibly up to and including NDAs. I find it unfortunate that we would
need to go to that extreme, especially given the goal of greater transparency
from the admin staff.
Kelly McKiernan
LUGNET Administrator
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: P&P document
|
| Whoa! NDA's !? You're kidding right !? This is just getting bizarre... This is exactly the kind of thing that is souring people. This just feels heavy-handed and dictatorial. No matter the reason, this is a bad idea. It smells rotten to say that (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: P&P document
|
| (...) This morning I sent you an email asking you to cancel my post where I made the P&P visible. I'll ask again to please cancel my post. Kevin (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
