 | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation] —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Instead of a number of top-level, one-ng trees, how about clustering these feeds under a single 'external sources' group. Something like lugnet.external-feed...sic-space? Or lugnet.loc.external....ass-space? (...) I'm not sure about pulling a (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation] —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) Right - have a top level group to host outside feeds. (...) Oh - I meant for each feed do one or the other, not both. (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation] —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That would make threaded conversations hard to follow, wouldn't it? Steve (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation] —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) How come? If the CS forums gets pulled into lugnet.space.C-S, how is it any more difficult to follow than if it's pulled into lugnet.external.C-S? (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation] —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, maybe I misunderstood. I thought you meant that (for instance) lugnet.space.C-S would be outgoing, and lugnet.external.C-S would be incoming. Of course, if the outgoing messages end up being echoed to the incoming feed, then everything (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
