Subject:
|
Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:06:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5160 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:04:34PM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> > I think it would make sense to import these feeds in two ways. One,
> > in their own trees, (classic-space.general, etc), and the other as
> > subgroups of related NGs (lugnet.space.classic-space).
>
> Instead of a number of top-level, one-ng trees, how about clustering
> these feeds under a single 'external sources' group. Something like
> lugnet.external-feeds.classic-space? Or lugnet.loc.external.class-
> space?
Right - have a top level group to host outside feeds.
> > Would something like that work? Of course, the other sites need to
> > agree before anything can be worked on...
>
> I'm not sure about pulling a feed into two places. Seems like it would
> make more sense to just have an @link in the web-interface.
Oh - I meant for each feed do one or the other, not both.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation]
|
| (...) Instead of a number of top-level, one-ng trees, how about clustering these feeds under a single 'external sources' group. Something like lugnet.external-feed...sic-space? Or lugnet.loc.external....ass-space? (...) I'm not sure about pulling a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
