 | | Re: wish's —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Elsewhere he can, subject to the rules and regulations, if any, of whatever place he does so. Not here. Here he is subject to the ToS like everyone else. So, to say that "he can do whatever he wants" is false, unless you add the codicil, "and (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: wish's —Calum Tsang
| | | | | | (...) I don't see him posting this contest here. He posted on "JLUG". There's a difference. (...) First, they're your words in that post. It's obvious Chris doesn't like you, but I wouldn't call that baiting by any means. If you didn't want to have (...) (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: wish's —Kevin L. Clague
| | | | | | (...) Yes. Weeks. This has been brewing for weeks, It only piqued in the last few days. But people have been bickering (from both sides) on this topic for weeks. (...) All your words are on the good list, but your tone is clearly provacative. Do you (...) (19 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) — Leonard Hoffman
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: wish's —Derek Raycraft
| | | | | Larry, You of all people should be the last person commenting on this. Nothing reeks more of conflict of interest or abuse of power then you rendering an explanation for Chris' banning. Derek (19 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
