 | | Re: "fired"? —David Eaton
| | | | (...) This seems a bit misplaced... How did Larry violate the TOU? By bringing up your employment? By correcting the library's wording? By saying that he didn't think you were the one responsible for the wording? For a few grammar and spelling (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "fired"? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Technically, the "no baiting/no bickering" policy isn't new, it's been in place for a while, and we treat it as part of the ToS although we acknowledge that the TOU document should be revised to include that material. (...) Bingo. That was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: "fired"? —Ken Nagel
| | | | | (...) I've addressed this complete with quotes from Lugnet polocies and updates. It's not a debate. Ken (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: "fired"? —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) Yes it is, for I didn't see a violation and, again my interpretation, you mis-applying the TOS does not make it right, so it is up for a debate. But again, that's just my stance. Further, in my opinion, you seem to be very selective as to what (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: "fired"? —Ken Nagel
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: Snipped unnecessary post (...) If your looking for a fight head back to one of the debate forums. Ken (19 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
