To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12146
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) This seems a bit misplaced... How did Larry violate the TOU? By bringing up your employment? By correcting the library's wording? By saying that he didn't think you were the one responsible for the wording? For a few grammar and spelling (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) Technically, the "no baiting/no bickering" policy isn't new, it's been in place for a while, and we treat it as part of the ToS although we acknowledge that the TOU document should be revised to include that material. (...) Bingo. That was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) I've addressed this complete with quotes from Lugnet polocies and updates. It's not a debate. Ken (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) Yes it is, for I didn't see a violation and, again my interpretation, you mis-applying the TOS does not make it right, so it is up for a debate. But again, that's just my stance. Further, in my opinion, you seem to be very selective as to what (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: "fired"?
 
In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote: Snipped unnecessary post (...) If your looking for a fight head back to one of the debate forums. Ken (19 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR