 | | Re: who does chris think he is? —Gerhard R. Istok
|
| | | (...) Thanks Kelly, One does not have to be college educated to be able to figure out if one has violated the ToS. I couldn't recite a single item from the ToS, because it has been so long since I read it. But I know the difference between crossing (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: who does chris think he is? —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) I know the difference between appropriate and inappropriate as well. I'm focusing in on this so called "pofanity" issue that the LUGNET admins seem to circling around like vultures waiting for prey. If they are not then I apologize for making (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: who does chris think he is? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) That reminds me of a few moths ago when I used 'jackass' in a post. It's a word that has been used on 'regular TV' (not cable or after 9 p.m.) but I was offered a polite warning via e-mail. So, on the one hand I'm all for common sense (my (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: who does chris think he is? —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) I agree with your reasoning, words aren't bad. It's all contextual. You can bet we're talking with people whose posts are inappropriate, trigger words or not. It's just that the ones with the f-bomb and such are only the most obvious. The (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
