 | | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) I think having a public record of timeouts is important - not only it allows the users (that you guys are serving, right?) keep an eye on how well you're doing your job, but it also shows that _something_ is getting done, and can be used to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Nothing really to add, but I agree with Dan. I'd want to see what the administration has done-- mostly to try and gauge: - how often are these things done? - what sorts of things result in timeouts? - has <person x> been timeoutted before? How (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | Hello! (...) I get the impression you are all for stigmas, are you? (I react quite sensitively on things like that, as in the country where - by chance - I was born, in the past stigmas were being used to discriminate people in the most nefarious (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I suppose you could say that-- and I'd like to think that nobody would discriminate based on such things, but it's information that sometimes helps me get a handle on who I'm talking to. Often before responding to someone on Lugnet that I (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
