 | | Re: Localities groups for New York City —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) BTW, Arlington, Virginia is (almost) to Washington, D.C. what Superior is to Duluth. So why is Arlington listed as lugnet.loc.us.va.arl and not as lugnet.loc.us.dc.arl? Well, even though a gazillion people work in D.C. and live in Arlington, (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Localities groups for New York City —Jeff Stembel
| | | | | (...) Of course Virginia gets a local group for D.C. suburbs, but not Maryland. Do I detect a state preference here? ;) But seriously, I would like to see a Local group for D.C.'s Northern suberbs, as they stretch up to Fredrick (an hour and a half (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Localities groups for New York City —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) How do you feel about each of the following--? lugnet.loc.us.md - Maryland, USA lugnet.loc.us.md.fre - Frederick, Maryland lugnet.loc.us.md.sal - Salisbury, Maryland lugnet.loc.us.md.cam - Cambridge, Maryland (Probably don't need both (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Localities groups for New York City —Jeff Stembel
| | | | | (...) Well, I don't think there is really a need for the Frederick Group, but a Northern DC Suburbs would be useful (I was just using Frederick as an example). It really is not convenient for me to go to Virginia, nor is it convenient for Virginians (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
