|
|
 | | Re: admin change
|
| (...) (or more, as you choose and as you feel you've used up more bandwidth) (...) I'd argue that LUGNET is profoundly commercial, in that it was intended to be a livelihood at one point. (22 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin change
|
| (...) Well, I certainly do forget a lot. (22 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin change
|
| (...) For only $50/month you can have a colo box at (URL) but it wouldn't be able to be used for commercial endeavors. Since I think the only commercial aspect to Lugnet is the Amazon and similar links, that is probably OK. They also do hosting on (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin change
|
| (...) I would like to also give a big thank you to Suz for the great support she has been to us, and for co-creating LUGNet. I know I have been mostly in the Lurker status for the past 8 months, but I have still enjoyed what LUGNet has to offer, and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin change
|
| <<snip>> (...) I can do this on GMT-time if the requests are posted to either a SPAM-free e-mail adress (yeah, right) or a newsgroup (don't know how this works since I have not needed it myself - *knock on wood*). <<snip>> (...) I'm afraid that (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
|
