 | | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003 — Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) Yes (...) Disk accesses should be significantly faster. How much of an impact this will have on overall performance is hard to predict. An educated guess might be 20% faster response, although I suppose it could be as little as 2% or as much (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003 —Mark de Kock
| | | | | | (...) Although you're the expert on this, may I stress the point of making a complete back-up prior to the operation? Oh, and make sure you test the back-up as well. You see, I work in IT and on several occasions, this fact was neglected, resulting (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003 — Todd Lehman
| | | | | | | (...) But of course. --Todd (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003 —Rob Hendrix
| | | | | "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:H9JEDv.7t3@lugnet.com... (...) YAAA...AAAYYY...YYY!!!...!!! -Rob (URL) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
