Subject:
|
Re: THE LAST WORD
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:18:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
KEILERS@USWEST.spamcakeNET
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
The first post which included personal info about Kurt follows. This really is the part
that is forgotten.
Subject:
Re: HELLO!!!??????
Date:
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 16:20:49 GMT
From:
Larry Pieniazek
Reply-To:
lpien@IWANTNOSPAM.ctp.com
Organization:
Junky Replacement computer due to HD crash
Newsgroups:
lugnet.trains
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8
Kurt Eilers wrote:
>
> I would like to buy a Railcar not have some sort of history lesson. In
> search of this set only. Please help if you can.
I have several but even if I intended to sell, I shan't sell to someone
that isn't interested in the correct terminology.
> Thanks for your help though... Ummmm, not to be rude,
Rather late for that, I'd say.
> but this is really what I am looking for.
And the reason we are discussing this, strange as it may seem to you, as
you seem concerned with your own desire only, is to increase the
knowledge of the group as a whole, not just for your benefit. Please try
to keep the spirit of the internet in mind in future, thanks. Multi way
flows of information increase the knowledge of all. Note also that we
are in lugnet.trains only now, and NOT market... so we are very very
much on topic.
If you don't wish to learn more about the prototype, by all means feel
free to ignore the thread, but do refrain from making rude remarks if
you can, thanks. John N. had told me offline that you were rather abrupt
and to let it go but I think you may've really stepped over the line
now. I can't speak for others but I did not find your behaviour
appropriate. In future you may or may not want to take that into
consideration.
++Lar
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
> >
> > <follow-up set to off-topic.debate)
> >
> > Umm, without meaning to get involved, I trust that the posting of private
> > e-mail to a (nominally) public new-group was in error, yes?
>
> I certainly did not give permission to do so and I believe that posting
> email without permission should be, and IS, a violation of LUGNET terms
> of use (from the Discussion groups terms of use, see
> http://www.lugnet.com/terms/) specifically:
>
> 6. Post or transmit any information, software, or other material
> which violates or infringes upon the rights of others, including
> material which is an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or
> which is protected by copyright, trademark, or other proprietary
> right, or derivative works with respect thereto, without first
> obtaining permission from the owner or right holder.
>
> This is an adminstrative issue. Hence I've copied admin.general, and not
> off-topic.debate.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
