| |
Larry Pieniazek writes:
> James Brown wrote:
> >
> > <follow-up set to off-topic.debate)
> >
> > Umm, without meaning to get involved, I trust that the posting of private
> > e-mail to a (nominally) public new-group was in error, yes?
>
> I certainly did not give permission to do so and I believe that posting
> email without permission should be, and IS, a violation of LUGNET terms
> of use (from the Discussion groups terms of use, see
> http://www.lugnet.com/terms/) specifically:
>
> 6. Post or transmit any information, software, or other material
> which violates or infringes upon the rights of others, including
> material which is an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or
> which is protected by copyright, trademark, or other proprietary
> right, or derivative works with respect thereto, without first
> obtaining permission from the owner or right holder.
>
> This is an adminstrative issue. Hence I've copied admin.general, and not
> off-topic.debate.
Absolutely. I originally set follow-up to .debate because of the potential for
controversy or flames. I didn't make it an adminstrative issue becuase I try
to give the benefit of the doubt, and suggested it might be in error, and
offered a solution to that error.
This was before I saw his post in .trains that also contained private
information, as a completely independent post. Once I would give the benefit
of the doubt, twice I would ask for explanation.
As an independant observer (and at roughly 7 months of participation, nominally
a newbie myself) I would suggest that Kurt seems unaware of many of the finer
points of net ettiquette, and did not respond well to attempts to remind him of
this, but he certainly hasn't done anything we haven't seen before (even in
only 7 months), assuming he can provide an explanation for the e-mail glitch.
And, of course, it ain't a patch on what TRL sees regularly.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: THE LAST WORD
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) nominally (...) finer (...) him of (...) glitch. (...) I think what James has said makes a lot of sense. I propose Todd emails Kurt directly, to obtain an explanation for the post. We can make assumptions of (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: THE LAST WORD
|
| (...) I certainly did not give permission to do so and I believe that posting email without permission should be, and IS, a violation of LUGNET terms of use (from the Discussion groups terms of use, see (URL) specifically: 6. Post or transmit any (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
