 | | Re: Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
(...) I think mine fit in .people...whatever... Matt (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GqpspD.Kq4@lugnet.com... (...) My bad... I followed Matt's lead yesterday though. ;-) I'll fut all of my replies away from .people and to .debate. -Tim (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
|
(...) I'd argue that this is an admin issue if it belongs anywhere on LUGNET(tm) at all. (which I doubt, at this point, that it does) It's a stretch to see how this fits the lugnet.people charter: lugnet.people– All about LEGO® people (enthusiasts, (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: followups in Outlook
|
|
Duh! Thanks - Stupid me :) -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gqp61J.Dzs@lugnet.com... (...) I'm (...) resorting (...) I'm (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: followups in Outlook
|
|
After you press "reply to group", go to "view" on the message window menu and select "all haeders". I have version 6. Good luck Scott A "James Stacey" <james@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:<Gqp4oH.B3L@lugnet.com>... (...) set (...) to (...) to (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | followups in Outlook
|
|
With everyone keen on keeping the right post in the right place (which I'm all for) I'll have to admit to getting a bit lost. Is there any way in Outlook to set a followup to a specific group? I can XPost fine but not set a followup Outlook (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) You are correct. Analogous to another relatively recent admin.general discussion, if you don't reply publicly to the effect, no one knows you did what you did, and we are left to assume that the issue is left unchecked. If you want to admonish (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) If I called up someone on the phone and said, "Hey friend, I think that was a little over-the-top" I don't think you would know. If we, at one of our monthly meetings brought up the faux pas that was posted in the newsgroup--again, I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) <snip> It is relevant to post the original post in .general, but it should be followed up in .market.brickshops. I do not have a problem with cross posting this kind of thing for interest's (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GqMrtn.4t1@lugnet.com... (...) discussion (...) community (...) I gotta agree with Matt here. This is something of interest to everyone who uses BrickBay - and not eveyrone visits (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
