 | | Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
| "LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GJM8L0.3y5@lugnet.com... (...) If they use the Recreational Software Advisory Council service (it comes with ie) Lugnet does not have a certificate(?), so it will deny access. Scott A (...) on (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
|
| "Dave Low" <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:GJx646.ICw@lugnet.com... (...) of angry (...) picture. (...) Show (...) I actually replied to myself. Scott A (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
| (...) Yes, you got that part right. (...) ??? Is this some kind of joke too? Where does eliticism enter here? You expressed bad form, people told you so. (...) It wasn't received as a joke, hence the reactions. (...) Of course I didn't notice, not (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
| (...) reaaaaaaal dry or simplistic. im sorry. dont count on me posting much anymore due to a) elitists, b) NOT ONE PERSON can take a joke... and c) if you didnt notice, i XFUT to OT.fun. rick (25 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
| "Rick Hallman" <legodude725@removeaol.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GK4JGt.HGB@lugnet.com... (...) With all due respect to the suffering Americans, I don't think this has anything to do with Lego, and it's certainly not following the rules for (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
|
