 | | Re: April Fools posts
|
| (...) Yea. I'm probably guilty of over analyzing things, but that's my nature I guess. In certain places it works very well. In other places it leaves very well tenderized horse meat around. (...) Lugnet is certainly going through some changes. A (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts
|
| I stick my toe in this one with trepidation. Mark and Frank are both right, I think. So is Bram. I can't be more precise about it without analysing the whole thing to death. And doing THAT... why, it changes the tone in the wrong direction. I want (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
| (...) Todd, can you please send Robert a warning over his language? Looks like we've got another "social engineer" being a jerk. (And of course, this is exactly what he wants me to do, and predicted I would yadda yadda) The terms of use are not set (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts
|
| I understand, and I don't know if it is worth bothering about either. Every post to Lugnet is not a personal communication between two people; it is an announcement to the entire community, or at least the subset that monitors the newsgroup. Before (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts
|
| (...) When I said LEGO is meant to be fun, I also meant that you shouldn't take it so seriously. Not every joke is funny to everyone, but there's no reason, IMO, to get offended about it. Live and let live, --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
