 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) First of all, I'm not 100% sure the term "second chance" applies. After all, he is a new member. We're not talking about "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" here. I'm also not suggesting that *every* time he acts up Lugnet (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: What's going to happen.
|
| Matthew wrote in message <39f06e60.3126733@ne...et.com>... (...) Firstly, thank you Matthew for apologising. I told you that it was the right thing to do. In future, please make an effort to moderate how you express your feelings, and if you do say (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Would you give cancer or a terrorist a second chance? Don't fall for plastic sentiment, faux remorse, and hollow words... John (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Oh, well done, Mike. Just slipped out, did it? Doesn't really cast a good light on your whole stance regarding Matthew's recent transgressions, now does it? Perhaps you should APOLOGISE TO MATTHEW RIGHT (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Moulton writes: By acting as a virtual punching (...) Matthew: Please give up the martyr routine. We are here because you have said some nasty things and violated the TOS. I feel just fine about myself today, thanks. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| Mike, could you please keep this hateful rubbish off LUGNET?!? Thank you. Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) (including (...) community (...) removed (...) LUGNET (...) person (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Your right. And for that reason, I would support banning him, as well. I would not support banning him *simply* because he maintains that graphic on his website, however. Nor would I support banning him simply because it's what he believes. If (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) No, I don't know that. Not based on what you said. If that's not how you feel, I suggest you stop obsessing over his disrespect for James, because that's certainly how it's sounding. (...) Fine, that was the final straw. But if he's learned (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I fully supported the ban on his posting privileges. His repeated diatribes that "James is dead. Deal with it", or whatever was reason enough - not because he in fact holds that uncompassionate and cruel sentiment, but because his repeated (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
