Subject:
|
Re: My Stance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:17:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3405 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, James Simpson writes:
> I fully supported the ban on his posting privileges. His repeated diatribes
> that "James is dead. Deal with it", or whatever was reason enough - not
> because
> he in fact holds that uncompassionate and cruel sentiment, but because his
> repeated expression of it was objectively calculated to flame and offend.
Your right. And for that reason, I would support banning him, as well.
I would not support banning him *simply* because he maintains that graphic on
his website, however. Nor would I support banning him simply because it's what
he believes.
If he continues to post in a way that is designed only to offend, I would be
one of the first asking to see him gone, as I was before. But if he's really
learned that kind of behaviour won't fly on Lugnet, and he wants to stay and
abide by the social order we have here, why not give him a second chance?
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Would you give cancer or a terrorist a second chance? Don't fall for plastic sentiment, faux remorse, and hollow words... John (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I fully supported the ban on his posting privileges. His repeated diatribes that "James is dead. Deal with it", or whatever was reason enough - not because he in fact holds that uncompassionate and cruel sentiment, but because his repeated (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
