 | | Memberships- Where to send them?
|
| To : Tood Lehman. I want to become a member of Lugnet! However with memberships I prefer to work with snail mail for application and confimration, rather than electronic ( especially whne payments are concerned.) Are you able to provide an adress to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) Agreed. (...) Uh, not really, some members prefer to keep that confidential. Especially younger ones; my mom specifically asked me to leave out my age (on my webpage too), even though I thought it was silly because everyone here knows all (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Thanks to those who mailed me. (...) *Sigh* (...) Substantiate this please, if you can. I see this time and time again here. Words are words. They not not suddenly change their meaning when one employs seeks legal advise... they are just the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> <snip> (...) 41. Not to be too picky, but I believe that Age is displayed only if the member wishes it to be. -Andy Lynch (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: FS/FT: OLD and NEW SETS
|
| (...) I am not sure I agree. I think standards of behaviour have to be enforced, and that while we may make certain allowances, one's age, mental health, mood, or political beliefs (to name a few factors that might be cited by someone trying to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Let's be clear here, are you asking for someone to mail you a description of the contents (which you've already seen if you've read the thread, but briefly, it's proprietary marketing and pricing information that is the property of TLC), or (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) sway (...) censor's (...) <SNIPPED> So if it is not "censorship", what is it? I missed the posts (e-mails welcome), so I have no real ideal what was in the post. So to me this denial of information, for no solid reason as far as I can see, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Agreed. And thanks for digging up the cyberlaw cite, those were the very cases I was referring to, although I was incorrect in referring to Compuserve as a common carrier, their defense was the library defense. (Believe it or not, I think (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) This is a very interesting read, IMHO: (URL) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) True, that is usually the case. However, according to M-W, to censor is to "[...] suppress or delete anything considered objectionable". "Suppress" certainly has connotations of "before publication", but "delete" doesn't. Anyway. It's not (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
