 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| Any chance we can fix the murfling code to spell the subject correctly? Yeah yeah, it isn't officially a word anyway, but I still think "(Murfled)" would be a better subject for murfled posts than "murfl". ROSCO (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I've stayed out of this thread until this comment. There is no evidence that Eric is in anyway better than this. There is plenty of evidence that he is not. Just because people get a rise out of him doesn't mean he is well-behaved. I had (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, you'd be qrong--the available evidence is that he, you know, is better than this. However, being sniped at by, well, many, many people, is grating and I can't blame someone for lashing out. That said, I fully realize that his lashing (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Shouldn't this be correctly posted in lugnet.admin.terms? Tim PS. Fup-to set to .off-topic.PUN ===== (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You have used this term incorrectly. Properly used, it is: D'OH! ====== Thank you. JOHN (19 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
