 | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) I do indeed understand. Another issue, especially with the long absense of Adminship, is to restore the feeling that there is law and order. That happens with people seeing consequences. If Eric had just suddenly stopped posting, there would (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) Another question: Assumming the rules are stated and understood by all, and "sentences" are fairly standardized, need non-admins be informed of the duration of something like a time-out? I worry about this because I don't want to see people (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) Yes. When it comes to mechanics, I see this as the only way. It simplifies the process, avoids potential chaos and builds respect for the authority. But that doesn't mean the admin need not be influenced by, say, an outcry from the people. (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) This is a difficult question to answer in specifics. I'm tempted to re-word your question from, "Should admins disregard.." to, "Should admins consider.." which makes it an easy: "Yes." LUGNET users' voices are always counting for something, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Thanks Suz, Sorry to have to dump this here, it just keeps coming up over and over, and I felt it should be addressed. In happier news, I hope once the Lugnet dust settles, you enjoy your well deserved break, and I hope to see you, at a fest, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
