|
|
 | | Re: admin.dev?
|
| (...) yeah. To be honest, this sort of stuff should be left to think about after the change in ownership. I mean, it's great to think and talk anytime - I just mean that, because there's no urgency, we needen't stress about it right now. -Suz (19 years ago, 3-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin.dev?
|
| (...) I will not claim that what you write is not true (because it probably is), but if we're talking voluntary work, you shouldn't expect coders to code things they can't see the point with. It is fine with somebody trying to give orders, but don't (...) (19 years ago, 2-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNet shut off
|
| (...) Just to remind, this was a blog entry from about a month ago - not an official announcement to the LUGNET community. (...) Boy, that went by fast. But it's August first and I am organized. yea! The "real" announcement is now being written. (19 years ago, 2-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin.dev? [Was: Dear NNTP users]
|
| (...) lol. yeah, well, I -do- miss that job, ya know? I haven't gotten to see any real improvements since years ago. back when LUGNET was fun. Hmm ..trying to remember what the last thing was. I guess it was the adding of the 'active threads in..' (...) (19 years ago, 2-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: admin.dev? [Was: Dear NNTP users]
|
| (...) Anyone.... Anyone... (else) Bueller??? Bueller??? (smile) (19 years ago, 2-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
