 | | Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
| (...) Why? For futureproofing. I suspect that NNTP will decrease its 'marketshare' as time goes on whilst RSS will increase. I could be wrong about that but from reading this tree, it seems I am not the only person who has dumped NNTP for reading (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
| (...) Yes. But why would anybody do that? NNTP is (IMO) the most logical transport protocol for RSS data anyway. That hack would only be needed if you transported RSS data over a non-threaded protocol like HTTP (which unfortunately often is the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
| --SNIP-- (...) --SNIP-- I think you could run a threaded discussion running RSS. If you look at the RSS 2.0 specifications there is a tag <category> which could be used to categorise each post as a subcategory of its parent. It's not as elegant as a (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Dear NNTP users,
|
| (...) Sensible. (...) Why not associate the format with the user account? NNTP actually has authentication built in. It's just not very common to use it. With some accounts named "<format>reader", we can let people select the format they get the FTX (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Print view
|
| (...) No. It happens more often that I switch to the "Nested: All" view. Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
