 | | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz-lists@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:IFxpoC.94s@lugnet.com... (...) How about lugnet.communitysites or lugnet.community.sites or something similar? That way one group could cover other portal/community sites. Richard. (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) but (...) You may not be typical, but you are certainly not alone. I'm another NNTP holdout. And let's not forget just *how much* the traffic drops on LUGNET when for some reason NNTP is down. Kevin ---...--- (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
|
(...) Hmm, we could add related sites to lugnet.org (lugnet.org.legofan) or we could create a new hierarchy lugnet.site, so it would be lugnset.site.legofan. If we do that, it would at least give people a place for all the "what's wrong with (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) For one, it is easier to sign up, read and follow threads. For old timers, it is also about opening up possibilities. At CSF and CC, what was just ".space" can be expanded into Space/General; Moonbase/Events; Space MOCs; Spacewerks/Inprocess; (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
"Terry Prosper" <terryprosper@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:IFtDGs.13qJ@lugnet.com... (...) vote (...) was cool, (...) Are there any statistics about the number of people who read LUGNET via NNTP versus via the web interface? I always read (...) (21 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
