To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *10451 (-5)
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) yup. I screwed up. -Suz (24 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) Actually Bill Ward is right... as an admin, Suz needs to lead by example. What she posted earlier today was in my opinion very shocking and inappropriate. I have to also look at her flaming policy as of late and "judge her by her own words"... (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) banned (...) No, I attacked her conduct. As the LUGNET Admin, she should be following a higher standard. Stooping to this level was completely out of line, and deserved a strong response. Please keep this in lugnet.admin.general, where I set (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
And then you turn around and attack Suz personally, I think you should be banned also. All you really needed was your first paragraph.. Tamy (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
 
(...) Her post sure seems to be in violation of the rules: (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR