 | | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) that can't be right? if you look at the message the server bounced at you, it has an html copy of the message, etc - seems like it was an email sent to the mailing list? or am I misunderstanding here? Dan (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) I think it was a fine design. I was simply offering an opinion from a different point of view. I took from her original post that she was showing the mock-up in case anyone wanted to offer an opinion. I'm not sure she was actively soliciting (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
Well, I don't want to come off as overly combative on this issue but I think Suz's design was fine and absolutely heading in the right direction. Keep in mind that the screen shot she posted first was a screen shot of her whole screen (the browser, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) But I did post via the web. Jude (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) yah, proper "vacation" programs should know not to respond to "bulk" mail. Unfortunately, some of the more common implementations are not so smart. (...) that is because that mail server (I think it's exchange?) does not reply to mail (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
