 | | Re: Flaming about guidance given
|
| (...) I'll connect the dots here, to make it as clear and concise as possible. The topic, in this specific case, was when should issues such as this get bumped to .admin. My issue had *nothing* to do with gentle guidance. I've said it before and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| I'm disagreeing with Larry here on some specific points, but I hope it's clear that at root, I agree with his stance on community guidance. It's something we need, even if our process needs refinement... (...) Larry, he was originally being friendly (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Luckily, that didn't happen here. (...) He wrote "Hey, nice advertisement for your BrickLink store! And you turn your nose up at banner ads! :-)" And it seems to me that "friendly ribbing" describes it aptly. It even seemed that Bram (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Flaming about guidance given
|
| (...) Yeah, I agree on that one. I would rather have a discussion without the arguements, so I can have peace of mind, cuz right now, this has nothing to do with portholes. (...) Pointless, yes. Tiresome? Definitely. I've had my say on this (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Flaming about guidance given
|
| (...) and an off topic follow up, one out of many that were ON topic... (...) I agree. If you're actually concerned about flame wars though, ask yourself who is doing the flaming and who is merely defending their actions in support of what the bulk (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
