 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) <snip> (...) If the admins were correcting as often as the "community" has been of late, I think it would be in such a way as to avoid the noise of our current method. I don't mind the community action. What I *do* mind is the fallout created (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Do you think that if “the admins” were still playing the role they used to here they would be stepping in and “correcting” quite as much? I worry about the *potential* for Todd’s apparent inactively to be used as an excuse to throw a little (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes: <snip 'cause I had to, not that I wanted to> (...) This is definitly 'big picture'!! Nicely said and done, Frank! Dave (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) I certainly agree that there seems to be a lot more "correction" and related noise. I think there are a few problems here. - The Lugnet admins have not had a lot of time recently to do the administrative stuff they used to do. This has (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: lost
|
| (...) you need to log in. you do that by clicking on the "Sign In" icon at the top of most LUGNET pages. You will need your member number, and your password. If you lost your password, write to admin@lugnet.com with your member number, and we will (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
